If you want to watch your friends hyperventilate, just suggest that someday soon marketers will be monitoring their behavior on their cell phones, both in terms of buttons pressed on the device, and places the device is carried. Be kind, though. Resist the temptation, and don’t add that it may already be happening. Right now.
And so you don’t freak out right along with your friends, let me reassure you of two things:
- I am not doing this monitoring. No way. Honest.
- Those who are don’t care about you. They use totally anonymous data.
They have no interest in what you’ve been up to — if it doesn’t involve legal commerce. Ultimately, all they want to do is make your cell phone more valuable in your pursuit of the next purchase.
Mediapost recently interviewed GoTo CEO Lee Hancock about the future of behavioral targeting in the mobile phone space.
He talks about a world where your cell phone serves up relevant ads and opportunities the same way that (for example) Gmail, the email account from Google, serves us ads based on keywords embedded in our messages. In both cases, an automated process eavesdrops on you to a certain extent, but only in the service of customizing the user experience. It’s a good thing. And, I’m sure, this cell phone behavioral profiling will be something consumers can opt out of once it is refined and deployed for real.
How would this particular type of monitoring improve a cell phone experience? Here is Mr. Hancock’s example:
One way [that] interest, behavior and location [data] could work seamlessly together is: Say someone has downloaded Madonna song ringtones and goes to the movie menu frequently. An entertainment company promoting a new Madonna movie can target based on that content and behavior, but also focus on the specific movie theater near where that user is. Then a Starbucks nearby having a special Frappuccino offer can target their promotion or a Barnes and Noble nearby the theater can promote a new Madonna coffee-table book. Very powerful stuff, but obviously something that needs to be done responsibly.
My take on this is that it shows promise, but I wonder how these messages will be presented to the user. We know that cell-based ads are not drawing strong responses when they are embedded in a phone’s web browser. And I, for one, would not want an SMS (text message) ad showing up on my cell phone every time I pass a Starbucks or music store. No, I need to initiate the suggestion process and be ready to consider the opportunities it presents.
A Modest Proposal
What if my cell phone had a single, additional button. When pressed, it “rewards” me. The reward it sends my way would be customized, as Hancock describes, based both on my behavior and where I am physically.
Please bear with me a moment. I’m going to make another Google comparison to illustrate my point.
When that search engine was new, it usually delivered more relevant and correct search results than competing search engines, including the goliath Yahoo! directory.
Google was boastful. The search page ballyhooed this advantage by providing two “Search” buttons. These buttons remain to this day. One delivers the top ten results, as most other search engines do. The other button is called, “I’m Feeling Lucky.” It takes you to the top result. Period. If you’re disappointed, you always have the “Back” button. But more often than not — especially back then, when the web was a smaller and simpler place — you got what you wanted.
That Google button is not something I use, but I’m sure for many it is like the food lever in Skinner’s classic box we learned about is Psych 101. That lever delivered a pellet of food each time it was pressed. It trained lab mice to associate a reward with this action.
Now imagine I’m the mouse — er — consumer. I’m in a mall, let’s say, and I’ve got a few minutes to kill before my wife returns from a shopping sortie. And I figure: What the heck. I press the button on my phone … the “I’m Feeling Lucky” button. And I receive via SMS a list of offers that I am likely to welcome. I may even act on one or two of them.
Will this be a game-changing feature on my phone? No.
But like Dr. Skinner and those lab mice, the behavioral targeting geniuses will have caused me to associate the gathering of this type of data with a positive outcome: The delivery of customized goodies that I truly welcome.
The “Lucky” button will connect me in a far richer way with my surroundings. I’ll receive merchants’ offers, yes, but also, possibly, news about nearby friends who have also opted into the system, or even tips on events in the neighborhood that may have passed my notice.
I like it. The button feels right to me.
How about to you?
Would you press such a button? Are you feeling lucky?
Sometimes all this talk just ticks me off (sorry, I’m a cranky New Yorker).
For all the hype that this is the “new world”, “new media”, etc., it’s just the same old, same old, delivered thru a different device.
The problem I have with your scenario is that it’s still PUSH. Pushing messages (ads, etc.) at me. Under the fictitious banner of “relevance”.
Here’s what I want to see: I’m wasting my time at the mall waiting for my wife and 3 daughters to finish up, I get out my cell phone and ASK IT TO GO FIND ME a coupon for a frappucino. It comes back and says 50 cents off at Starbucks or 25 cents off at Dunkin Donuts, your choice Ron.
I go to DD (because the line at Starbucks is too long, there’s no place to sit, and lets face it — the coffee isn’t that good in the first place), order the drink, and beam them back the coupon.
It’s about time advertisers really understood that the majority of consumers do NOT need to be told what they want. We already know. Make it easier for me to get what I want — stop trying to tell me what I want, and stop assuming I don’t know what’s available.
Have you had your discounted coffee yet, Ron? The only pushing with my scenario is when the consumer pushed the “Lucky” request button. Then the consumer gets both the Dunkin Donuts coupon and the Starbuck’s coupon, to use your example. I’m with you on the problems of push, especially as it applies to something as intimate as my cell phone. This button would turn this into “pull,” the same as a search request on Google.
If mobile marketing goes the way of the ringtone industry, it’s going to be a fun next couple of years.
I suspect there will be a demographic that will avail itself of services like this…and those (like me) who prefer to harden our hearts against intrusive marketing. It freaks me out when I find that a casual word I’ve posted on an Internet message board results in certain ad links appearing at the top of the page. I’m still trying to figure out which post inspired the ad for Crohn’s disease treatment.
Jeff, how long on average do you have to wait at the mall before your wife shows up?
This sounds plausible to me. I’m switching to tea.
Hi, Holly —
Jeff, how long on average do you have to wait at the mall before your wife shows up?
An eternity. But it’s worth it (right, Julie?)